• Murais@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 months ago

    As long as you commodify my labor, it has value.

    Whose labor generates more value? The worker, who creates the product being sold to generate profit, or the boss who manages them?

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      69
      ·
      10 months ago

      Without the boss, there wouldn't be the worker or the company. Let's not pretend that the entire management does nothing.

      • Murais@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        But in all seriousness, think of strikes and the inherent power of labor.

        How come management never strikes?

        When workers strike and there are no workers in the building, the day comes to a screeching halt and NOTHING happens.

        If there are no managers in the building, business continues as usual. Because it happens all of the fucking time. That's why your manager can go on vacation for weeks at a time and nobody gives a shit, but you're lucky if you get 5 days in a whole calendar year.

      • Murais@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes. What ever did humanity do for work before the invention of middle management?

        It must have been chaos. Bedlam, even!

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          10 months ago

          Since you're describing a society with no infrastructure whatsoever, yeah, basically.

          • Murais@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            No hierarchy doesn't mean the same as no infrastructure and never has.

            It's a commonly repeated lie to equate them as meaning the same thing.

            EDIT: Middle management is also a phenomenon of the Industrial Era. Prior to industrialization, humanity (and jobs) existed for thousands of years.

            According to some here, that is impossible.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              "Middle management" as a concept is simply "someone gives you directives and you give someone else directives" and that is literally as old as society itself.

              The Mayans didn't build highways through a fucking jungle without middle management, and they were most definitely not "industrialized."

              Also the whole "middle management bad" meme is pants on head stupid. Almost as stupid as your interest in going back to subsistence farming.

              • Murais@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I never implied a necessary return to subsistence farming. I said that hierarchy is not necessary for society to exist, but you continue to equate the two.

                Mayans didn't build highways, because the technology and the necessity were not present. But they did build roads. And bridges. And pressurized aqueducts. And they did it without an "Assistant Director of Construction."

                Y'know. Infrastructure. With limited hierarchy.

                Saying that human civilization and the necessary infrastructure to support it is impossible without traditional corporate hierarchy isn't just wrong, it's fucking propaganda. And it's propaganda designed specifically to depress the value of labor.

                  • Murais@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    My dude, if you can only imagine one system of social organization as being correct or successful, I don't think it's my intellect you need to concern yourself with.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Most companies' performance do not have any correlation to upper management's actions