Wow this post got popular. I got called into work and didnt see the replies, sorry ladies and gentlemen! Trying to catch up tonight.

  • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I did and then encouraged you to use the same search terms I did to find it. It's OK though you had no intention of legitimately engaging in this, I know. Later fucko.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I read your 'source', and pitbulls.org is not an unbiased source (wtf how can you think that even). Wikipedia is. Wikipedia supports my claims, end of discussion.

      Goddamn you need to go back to school maybe learn about credible source materials.

      • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Man it wouldn't matter what I provided, you're gonna bitch about it anyways. People using "uMmM sOuRcE?!" Online today are just grasping at straws trying to be on the offense desperate to look intelligent.

        "My source supported my claims therefore I am right and you are wrong" is such a dipshit move, you're a bitch dude. Kindly fuck off.

          • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            If you would read what I sent you, you would realize what my point is. It isn't some hype article about the cutest bestest dog breed that does no harm. It is a truthful background on the breed.

            But no, you see the name of the website and cry about how bias it is. You're a jackass. I'm not responding to you anymore, go live your life.