GiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agoThe recession should probably be here by nowwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up146arrow-down19
arrow-up137arrow-down1external-linkThe recession should probably be here by nowwww.axios.comGiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-square3laws@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months ago Yes they moved the goalposts and they still managed to be wrong Well, fancy that. Anywho… for a second there I thought your instance was @redhat.com
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoStill not wrong. And this isn’t Linux
minus-squaregowan@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoNo 100% wrong and so wrong your source backs it up.
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoYeah, no. It was coined in 1929, under capitalism. I was right. Before they were called financial disasters or slumps.
minus-squaregowan@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoWhich mean the same thing. You cannot be this dense.
minus-squareTokenBoomer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoIt’s semantics, but you challenged my comment. I did the research and proved you wrong. Recessions didn’t occur until 1929. Google it.
Well, fancy that.
Anywho… for a second there I thought your instance was @redhat.com
Still not wrong. And this isn’t Linux
No 100% wrong and so wrong your source backs it up.
Yeah, no. It was coined in 1929, under capitalism. I was right. Before they were called financial disasters or slumps.
Which mean the same thing. You cannot be this dense.
It’s semantics, but you challenged my comment. I did the research and proved you wrong. Recessions didn’t occur until 1929. Google it.