But I’ve spent most of the time tweaking and setting up and downloading stuff rather than actually playing. Games seem to work really well. Not doing benchmarking but I really like how stable the framerate is when frame cap is in place. So far everything I’ve tried was absolutely buttery smooth.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m heavily eyeing the switch to arch for gaming on my main rig. Testing it on a laptop rn but I got lost in rice land before even installing steam

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’ve been messing with Mint for a year but didn’t do much with it. I’m loving arch so far. I think I’ll weather whatever storm comes my way.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I used Ubuntu before Arch, and I would say the opposite is true. Ubuntu disabled all the repos you had to add just to get up to date software, and would often just fall over with every version update.

        Anyone that wants to game on Linux should stay away from Ubuntu IMHO, unless you like playing old games and a system you cannot update without fear of having to reinstall the whole OS like Windows back in the day.

            • just_another_person@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yours isn’t.

              If you had some issue with repos not working, that’s on you. Nothing about the defaults on Ubuntu stop you from installing anything as you describe.

              • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)A
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                My whole argument against using an outdated distro is that you need to add a PPA for so many things, and then each major upgrade disables them without any insightful way for a new user to change the release name and re-enable them.

                There is a reason Valve moved away from Ubuntu and to a rolling release distro. I’m not sure what you’re not able to grok here.

                • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Valve used Arch as base because of the advanced package and kernel management, something users just wanting to game wouldn’t want and don’t know how to effectively use, hence, my original comment you started this argument about.

                  No idea why you keep saying “outdated”, because that makes no sense. If you mean not running bleeding edge kernels or package versions, that is every distro out there, and I think you Gail to understand how release management and version pinning works.

    • snekerpimp@lemmy.snekerpimp.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Debian is now amazing with gaming, with amd at least. I made the switch from arch, and have no issues with any game. Would recommend Debian with xfce all day long.

      • stark@qlemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Recent Windows user who moved to Arch here. I was debating between Debian and Arch when I first migrated. What makes gaming easier on Debian? Less packages to install to get going?