• noahm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    336
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Its use of a single letter app name did, too, and we see how quickly they bent the rules to accommodate the name change.

    • GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      Both Apple and Google benefit from Twitter “nazifying” their users so they vote Repug and pay zero taxes. They’ll never do shit.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly my thoughts, the rules are bullshit if they are not equal for everybody.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      The single letter name exception is basically everything you need to know. It’s all bullshit.

    • The dogspaw @midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I can see making an exception for a single letter name but block is an essential feature of any social network not having it could leave you open to a lawsuit and possibly charges from a stalking murder case

      • noahm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, hopefully. Musk loves pushing boundaries. Eventually you wonder if he pushes too far. As other comments here suggest, though, the one thing he really highlights is the arbitrary nature and general inconsistency of these boundaries. The rules may be written down, but they don’t apply equally. It’s helpful to be reminded of that sometimes.