Donald Trump on Tuesday filed a U.S. Supreme Court brief in his bid for criminal immunity for trying to overturn his 2020 election loss, arguing that a former president enjoys “absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for his official acts.”

The case is due to be argued before the justices on April 25. Trump has appealed a lower court’s rejection of his request to be shielded from the criminal case being pursued by Special Counsel Jack Smith because he was serving as president when he took the actions at the center of the case.

The filing advances arguments similar to ones Trump’s lawyers previously have made and echoes statements he has made on the campaign trail as he seeks to regain the presidency.

“The president cannot function, and the presidency itself cannot retain its vital independence, if the president faces criminal prosecution for official acts once he leaves office,” the filing said.

  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    He has access to the entire american market im sure he could find someone.

    Cant be impeached if hes immune to to everything as trumps trying to implement.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Legal immunity would not nullify the impeachment powers of congress enshrined in the constitution.

      It’s already partially a political thing that’s done at their discretion.

      Trump’s argument Is that impeachment is how a president is held accountable. In this case, removal from office is the punishment.

      • BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        It would nullify it, because all you’d need to do is sit in congress with a shotgun ready for one of them to even begin the word “impeach”

        • APassenger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          In this scenario, yes. Though it seems inelegant and unlikely in this form, the threat of death would cow most.

          It would mean our government has already collapsed and we’re just watching the final gasp.

          It’s also why I’ve not enjoyed seeing the dem/rep split on guns. The left may own guns, but I’m not sure there’s as as many or as much willingness as the other way around.