• Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Trying to stop people from doing something is a sure fire way to guarantee they will do that thing.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not that. It’s that if you tell a horny teenager that there’s pictures of naked people somewhere they’ll move heaven and earth to get to it.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      78
      ·
      11 months ago

      Guess we shouldn’t have any laws about anything, then.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        67
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Bit of a leap, my dude.

        Of course we should have laws.

        But for things that are actually harmful.

        For everything else we should have regulation.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          52
          ·
          11 months ago

          If your single point is “trying to stop people only makes them do it more”, than no, it’s not a “leap”. That invalidates the very idea of having laws in the first place.

          And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

          • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            We didn’t say this about everything (although it is true that some kinds of people are attracted to anything forbidden). We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              We said it’s true of teenagers and porn. Duh.

              I don’t see any such qualifiers. Do you?

              • Orphie Baby@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Semi-Hemi-Demigod said:

                It’s not that. It’s that if you tell a horny teenager that there’s pictures of naked people somewhere they’ll move heaven and earth to get to it.

                • Ech@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I wasn’t responding to them, so how does that matter?

          • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            And fwiw, I’m not arguing in favor of this law, just against the idea you replied with.

            Whatever you’re arguing for or against, you’re arguing like a drunk uncle. You’re taking it to an extreme that it’s obvious no one actually intended, and then arguing against that extreme like it was the original point.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not arguing against extremes, I’m arguing against a bad argument. And I’m not drunk, I only wish I were.