![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://feddit.uk/pictrs/image/402440a2-c9ee-4373-8c98-d55bda8ee4fa.png)
There’s actually a term for it
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dummy_candidate
Or this - see the UK section
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_candidate
“All the work to be a candidate”…
There’s actually a term for it
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dummy_candidate
Or this - see the UK section
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_candidate
“All the work to be a candidate”…
Sweet summer child…
Nope, for cutting bone
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chainsaw
That article is pretty inaccurate overall… people have reliably lived beyond 40 for thousands of years
Less and less over time
I think I missed that one. Got a case name for it?
Best time to make a change was 20 years ago. Second best time is now. Progress is progress. Would you rather it continue to not happen?
Bored toddler.
Slouched forward shoulders, weight on my heels, head back with a pained expression and small crying sounds.
This doesn’t feel like news worth anyone’s time…
1: I wholeheartedly believe being a whistleblower is a courageous and brave act. Full stop.
2: drawing conclusions as to why these people decided to speak up when they did without hearing it from them is nonsense.
3: assuming and repeating a John Gresham novel from news articles between corporations and their whistleblowers is not only buying into a conspiracy theory, but is also parroting it.
4: partaking in these conspiratorial shenanigans helps no one and isn’t something to be waved away as harmless - otherwise, what’s the difference here and qanon?
If the “bravery” and admiration comes against the idea of assassination, then it completely matters. Idk why you’re hand waving the nonsense here
I’m on your side dude, the response here is kinda nuts.
Well…the first dude did say something about Boeing killing whistleblowers and the bravery of others to step up in defiance of that.
So that whole line of thinking is conspiracy theory stuff with no real proof and it is being parroted here. Granted, usually the assassination stuff is usually tongue in cheek, but the top comment seems a bit crazy.
Ridin’ with Biden despite the genocidin’
It doesn’t show any progression - the examples here are different events and not in chronological order
deleted by creator
It’s hard to have pity for people who do this, especially if enough people stopped, the service would get cheaper.
For what it’s worth, I agree with your interpretation here. The executor’s statements are just douchey and inflammatory, but yeah - the will says what one wants to be done. Others may contest it and the executor tries to act on your behalf to get what you want done.
Same except opposite for me. Communication on the right, info on left
Dems are promoting pragmatism, which can be an extremely useful strategy.
So we’re just ignoring this part then?