These are very valid arguments that can’t be reduced to a lack of habit. Thanks for sharing your perspective!

Are you american? If so, the “unwieldy and too long” is probably because you’re not used to it. I’m not used to letter-size and it seems weirdly short and unnecessarily wide but I know it’s because I’m just not used to it.

Looks like it does the job perfectly. Thanks!

Does anyone know the artist?

Basically the rest of the maze

😢

Entschuldigung, ich lehre Deutsch. Was bedeudet “Bogen nutzen”?

It’s a fourth-wall breaking game, a game whose characters are aware that they’re in a game. Their personalities, knowledge, and awareness change throughout the game and the consistency is limited to “pathes” that you take. The devs are playing with and making fun of the rules.

There has been quite some history between the revolution and the current labor rights… specifically five changes in political system including four republics and two empires. The first republic was probably less ideal than you imagine.

It’s replacing the ear of the cup. You’re not supposed to hold it by grabbing it with your hand (like a glass), but by the tip of your fingers.

No idea. Maybe donations, fees from conventions, ad revenue…?

Obligatory PSA about not feeding ducks with bread because it’s unealthy for them and pollutes water.

It’s apparently early in development, but there’s an ActivityPub implementation of wikis made by one of Lemmy’s dev.

Why wouldn’t the friends like it then?

Damn I’m surprised you say that. I’m a native french speaker I’ve always thought that portuguese is a godsend. So fewer bullshit, so much more rational…

Another possible interpretation I haven’t seen in the comments: it’s possibly about capitalism under which companies fund school where you learn that it’s normal to be a wage slave or something like that?

I didn’t know the concept of human right was not consensual, thanks. Despite you opening that topic, I notice that you still use the concept in your argument, you must have a personal definition in your mind.

If not, then we are OK with them violating human rights (and women rights specifically, too)?

That:

the Islamists, which is significant part of Muslim population

is a strong statement that requires a very large study across the very diverse muslim populations in the world. Gonna need a citation on this one.

And most westerners that accuse China of human right abuses are equally not okay with islamists’ abuses, so there’s no dichotomy.

The issue most people have with jihadists and ISIS is that they abuse many human rights, first among them murder. Not beliefs, acts. And human rights is exactly what people are blaming China for, too.

Now jail is contentious. Freedom is a human right. How much and how should we deprive someone’s rights to protect the rights of others? I don’t have the answer

I think religion is a package with multiple components. Core components are certainly contentious: belief you might not share, philosophy to which you might not adhere, myths and stories where you might value historical truth, rituals that might be harmful, and often the most problematic, power structures.

But there’s also aspects linked to religion that can be considered valuable (or at least harmless): clothing, names, architecture, various art forms, sometimes language, etc. So, even if only religion is targeted, there’s a lot of baggage linked to that. I don’t know enough about the situation to say how China is handling this intertwine between religion and culture.

I agree, that’s up to debate. Genocide is killing the “genus”, the family in latin. In plain english, it’s killing a “people”. But what’s a people? The individuals that compose it, or its culture, traditions and memory? That’s subjective I’m afraid.

At least I hope we can agree that both are pretty bad.