![](https://media.kbin.social/media/d4/65/d46507ce34dccf9631d7bda6a429cba8f6f6551e8b40260a242c5db27733b7a0.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Front trunk. It’s aggravating slang, but it’s been in use for decades, well before Tesla.
Other accounts:
Front trunk. It’s aggravating slang, but it’s been in use for decades, well before Tesla.
…At least six?
They’re just banking on all the parents being transphobic enough that nobody can get help from family friends
No, Ted Cruz’s pecker started pouring out beans… 😭
The only gripe I have with this article is that I’m not convinced why the metric of “we want people to query more on Google” should be concerning to me. That just sounds like “we want more people to use our product more”, which is a completely reasonable metric for any business, no?
It’s a search engine, so if it’s taking you more queries than previously to find what you’re looking for, that means the quality of the search results has decreased.
Instead of the search team being able to focus on quality as they had been, they were more or less pushed to sabotage the quality of search in order to increase ad revenue.
That’s my understanding, anyway.
This is why we need a corporate death penalty.
Probably for the best that they cut themselves off from the Internet.
this is a really good dad joke, on first read it went completely over my head
I think I’m gonna trust someone from Harvard over your as-seen-on-TV looking ass account, but thanks for the entertainment you’ve provided by trying to argue with some of the actual mathematicians in here
We’re going to need a lot of them, they’re only worth $10
Yeah, sounds like you are a real life zebra. I’m hopeful that you can get some answers. Looking forward to a future post celebrating them.
There are already plenty of companies that sell managed data removal like this, Mozilla claims to be doing it better and perhaps they are incrementally more trustworthy than the smaller no name ones
What is wrong with the title? Genuine question. It seems to represent the content of the article pretty accurately.
And yet it gets the screen reflection in its eyes, and the light cast on its fur, convincingly correct. Wild
What a detailed post, that was a fun read. You clearly live a much more interesting life than some of us
For accuracy, it should be updated to read “Snitches will need stitches.”
… :(
What are you talking about? There are endless services where you can get a free email address without spending a cent. Verifying that an email is genuine is a much harder ask than you might think.
I still remember staring into that giant ball of plasma and thinking it was the coolest thing I’d ever seen in a video game.
It’s an absolute tragedy we never got a half-life 3.
The frequency with which people have trouble with newspaper-headline grammar makes me feel old…