![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/cd304a0c-e258-4a87-86cd-7ce21eb70191.png)
LET’S GOOOOOOOO
LET’S GOOOOOOOO
Nunca nem sequer considerei, eu comprei o meu servidor por menos de 200 reais na seção de notebooks velhos do facebook marketplace kk
They fixed tens of bugs in a week’s time? Holy shit
awesome!!
I think it’s okay to check what the app is going to access in your system. I’m just talking about the warning design, this comment suggests a different approach for a less alarming design.
I think they should just follow the example of every other app store; list the permissions in an easily understandable list and let the user decide whether or not they are comfortable with it.
Totally agree. The “verified” label will give new users enough comfort, and the ones who wish to know more will read the permissions.
It’s not specific to browsers, but to every flatpak that is verified and has the potentially unsafe warning.
SEGURA O BONDE PAI 😎
They pulled the opposite of the enshitification, haha.
Positification ftw
Ok. Tell me how A.I made your life better so far
fuck us
thank you very much for the tip, I used chat gpt and it helped me to guarantee the right permissions, I can now connect to the web ui but I’m not getting “We’re unable to connect to the selected server right now. Please ensure it is running and try again.”
I see, did nvidia give a release date? I’m completely out of the loop
Anybody using it? Is it better?
this is so dope