I remember. The turbo on my 386 didn’t make it faster. It made non turbo mode slower.
I remember. The turbo on my 386 didn’t make it faster. It made non turbo mode slower.
The Court has to know that ruling a former President immune for breaking the law isn’t a viable decision.
Like, it would immediately make any sitting President a king, and supercede the Court’s power.
Which is why they’ll wait, but rule he isn’t immune. Not because it’s the right thing, but because doing otherwise would make the Court less, and they’re selfish fucks that want to be on top.
That’s all well and good, but remember,
concurring opinion
…is what matters at the end of the day.
Because Trump pardoned him.
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/23/949820820/trump-pardons-roger-stone-paul-manafort-and-charles-kushner
I think an “arms race” that forever expands the court – and thus dilutes the individual relevance of a single Justice – is a good thing.
A single Justice dying or retiring should not be the sort of thing to reshape the entire country.
In this case, remembering standing means they don’t have to double down and rule on abortion itself again.
my mom mostly stays downstairs and her friend mostly stays upstairs
So you’re saying your mom is a bottom? /s
Altruism is never going to be the way to get companies to do the right thing. Instead, making the wrong thing a financial liability is.
It’s only new-feeling cause it’s been 20-some years since we’ve had a democratic control of most parts of the government.
It’s pretty neat, right?
There are no hard requirements for being president beyond those listed in the Constitution:
That’s it. The framers of the Constitution presumably felt being a convicted felon would be enough for an electorate (or the electoral college, at least) to simply not vote for that person.
History will forget her.
How many people remember stupid congresspeople from 30 years ago?
Imhofe bringing a snowball to the Senate floor, this disproving climate change, for example. You and i and historians might, but average Joe on the street?
Oh no.
Not undermine the legitimacy of the Court!
Those fucksticks did it themselves. Anything the Executive does to put it back on course is an improvement.
then paying off said pornstar to interfere with the election outcomes?
You forgot the most important part: Feloniously classifying those payments as “legal expenses.”
There’s an IDE drive in a landfill somewhere with 10BTC on it because I’m fuckwit.
I think a better question: Why are they reading YouTube comments?
Impeachment is the accusation and happens in the House. They draft “Articles of Impeachment” and pass them like any other bill, with a majority vote.
The Senate then holds a trial while the House provides a prosecutor of those charges. The Senate acts as a jury and, to convict, requires a “2/3rd majority of those present”
Trump, for example was impeached twice, successfully. The Senate failed to convict both times.
Preachin to the choir, friend. I’d get worked up about it but I’m paid the same regardless of how upset I get.
I do one, the other senior dev does the other. We fight about it in pull requests.
I admit, this news has made me add a note to re-download firefox on my work machine…
Fyi: people often take out more than one loan, and leave the lowest interest federal loans for last…