Cute and useless, as is customary for ya.

People are looking for clarity about all this, I used the word chafe on purpose.

Think about it.

There’s also CalyxOS, low drama and very reliable. Https://www.calyxos.org

Adding distracting points into the public discourse when people are seeking clarity doesn’t seem like a noble goal.

What do you get out of it at the end, the ability to say “told you so”?

What if Kamala does step in due to the very real odds of a medical issue happening, then shall we start believing conspiracy theorists on other points?

My point remains the same, you’re occluding understanding of the situation, both currently and in the future, and I don’t like that.

Poor fella. Read my question again, but this time try to think about it.

Doubtful.

Then why parrot chafe into the conversation at all?

Phew, I ate a beyond burger earlier and I’m still cogent and coherent. Guess it’s the corn syrup, just like my dad warned me.

I’d like to know what you’re taking so I never take it.

Sure, sounds correct. But in the mean time, at least get the checkout system working, we’ve gotta be pragmatic.

I wonder why it’s been out so long? Definitely don’t pay those ransomware asshats.

Pretty clever, and I like how organic it looks. Come to think of it, wasn’t H.R. Giger also Swiss?

Guess they like those organic designs.

Ooof that’s horrifying

Built, physically operational reactors that operate as close to Q=1 as they can, with all the diagnostics included.

The diagnostics are very important, as plasma instabilities have been, and continue to be, the critical issue preventing anything useful coming out of our decades of fusion reactor design. All these companies are sharing data on overcoming plasma instability issues, with multiple geometries aimed at evaluating how plasma responds to different inputs in different environments. We’re all trying to understand how to control and compress something far too hot to physically touch.

@naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca scaling fusion isn’t a trivial problem, and saying it like it is indicates a lack of background knowledge. This isn’t a competition between companies (no matter what our CEOs suggest), as we in industry quietly all agree that any of us that cracks this unchains humanity from the solar system. Because government funding has unfortunately sucked so much ass, we’re sort of using private money to get the basic research done. We’d be so much farther ahead otherwise.

Good points and questions. First wall interaction is going to be an interesting problem for this team to work around.

No??

I’ve supported engineering at several privately funded nuclear fusion companies, though all of them, this Chinese company included, are building a product out of public school research.

Off the top of my head there’s:

• CFS
• TAE technologies
• Thea
• Zap Energy

And several more…

Say it again, friend.

That’s exactly the mechanism being exploited, yes.

At least in the US, a lot of fault hinges on rear impact. Not worth a damn, however, with how many dashcams people have now. These idiots still try though.

Missing the forest for the trees here. This is a perfect example of outsider dissipation of our energy in making a conclusive decision on how to proceed.

Read my comment again, you’ll notice what I’m equating the discomfort to as it currently stands.

Oof, this comment has a lot of correct content individually, but as a response, undoes all your previous points.