![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
Or leave them there. Let foreign interference put effort into these people. Pull the rug right at/just before election.
Pull the rug now and there is time to turn more politicians.
Or leave them there. Let foreign interference put effort into these people. Pull the rug right at/just before election.
Pull the rug now and there is time to turn more politicians.
For example, if I’m not mistaken, California has similar laws on the books and I am fairly certain that uber and lyft include tips in the hourly min. They will probably do similar up your way unless your law makers are some how much smarter and tougher than ours and thought through the possible ways they could work this law.
According to this source
Tips from people receiving the service do not count toward earnings
So that should address that one.
If you allow me to combine:
if I’m not mistaken, California has similar laws on the books
And
I’m going on the presumption that they will do what they will do and that politicians are going to be similar regardless of country or tax laws, etc.
According to this source
“In the middle of an affordability crisis, a ridesharing expense rate that is over 50% higher than the comparable rate in California is unreasonable — and we encourage the government to reconsider the consequences for British Columbians who rely on rideshare and delivery,” emailed Keerthana Rang, the Canadian communications lead for Uber.
So I would think the laws must differ if it makes it comparatively 50% more expensive than California (50% expensive to who? Not sure, I’m guessing the companies are explicitly opaque on that)
As for
If you can prove that Canada is somehow impervious to what they have done everywhere since these companies have existed, I’ll move asap
No one is impervious, the government could change any day and upend the decision. What I can speak to is the current government, who say things like, according to this source :
At an unrelated news conference Friday, B.C. Premier David Eby said despite complaints, regulations will not change. “These companies can suck it up. They’ll be alright,. They’ll be fine,” he said.
Which shows a bit of commitment from the serving party. And also, beyond this salary minimum (it is a minimum, companies are allowed to pay more) they’ve promised to action the following items according to this source :
All ride-hailing service and delivery workers will be covered through WorkSafeBC. Companies will be required to see the location and estimated pay for a job before it is accepted. If workers are suspended or deactivated from an app, companies must tell them why. Companies must ensure 100 per cent of the tips paid by customers go directly to the worker responsible for the service. Establish a 35- to 45-cent minimum per-kilometre vehicle allowance to help workers cover expenses.
While BC is the starting point, politicians aren’t the champion of this movement, it’s UFCW. What union do you belong to?
The issue is that your assumptions are based on how USA legal, employment, and tax systems work. These are different in Canada.
I’m not saying that aren’t valid points, I’m saying those points don’t necessarily apply.
Bacon thrice.
Coffee thrice.
You are away this article is about the Canadian province of British Columbia?
As a Quebecer, Life is Pain.
There is a small international conference for a new standardization treaty including America, the UK, France, Spain, and Germany.
This being mostly a working group, the decision was made to do everything as a web conference, but during set-up the American is have some difficulties getting thier webcamera to work. After a short IT visit the American asks “Howdy, can everyone see me?” To which the remainder reply “Yes”, “oui”, “si”, “ja”.
Slowing appreciation below inflation is depreciation/losing value. It’s a hard tagert to nail, but if we can keep the needle between static price and inflation; we’re doing well.
They’d not only lose money on their life savings, they’d be trapped, unable to ever move without paying even more money, or filing bankruptcy if they don’t have more money to lose.
This already happens, we just don’t hear about it. And we normally blame the homeowner for falling into a preditory trap.
Also the building envelope and internals IS a depreciating asset, always has been. It takes effort to maintain it.
Right now it’s just the land values rocketing so high that on many places the crack shacks sitting on top depreciates slower than land value increases. So people’s homes are still losing money, it’s just the land underneath them goes up faster.
Edit:
They’d not only lose money on their life savings
Diversify yo bonds.
Devaluing them in a deliberate and controlled manner is much better then waiting for a crash.
Some do (like WhatsApp)
Sure, but you would think an employer that directly benifts from unionisation can absolutely help their employees organise and reduce the normal anti-unionisation hurdles.
While centres with unionized staff are eligible for that funding to cover pay hikes in collective agreements, daycares like Sunnyside Garden where staff are not unionized cannot use it to cover wage increases.
So unionize your workers?
I think it should be the city, but I’m here for it.
Ah, I misread that as a child between 4-5 years.
Second language failures strike again!
The kid was five
First measles shot (as part of MMRV) is 12 months, the second is ~18 months, but varies by province. You can get a dose as early as six months, but the child will still need to follow the standard timeline after this additional dose.
Stick to domestic corporation spying please, Canadians.
Preaching to the choir here.