• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The biggest factor is their overall size. A Russian Karakurt class corvette (of which the OP ship is a member) displaces 860 tons, while a US Arleigh Burke class destroyer displaces over 11x as much weight at 9.700 tons. That combined with significantly lower wages in Russia pretty much accounts for the entire difference.

    Additionally, the Burke’s superstructure clearly has much more ‘stuff’ on it than a Karakurt does, so in addition to being much larger, a Arleigh Burke is going to be much more capable at various tasks.

    US destroyer

    I know the US calls them destroyers, but they are the size of a WWII light cruiser. The Atlanta class light cruisers displace 8.300 tons; they are actually lighter than a modern Arleigh Burke destroyer!

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Additionally, the Burke’s superstructure clearly has much more ‘stuff’ on it than a Karakurt does, so in addition to being much larger, a Arleigh Burke is going to be much more capable at various tasks.

      It has 90 missile cells compared to 8, anti submarine ability (compared to none), multiple different radar sets and triple fire control systems, 2 helicopters, and it’ll go 4000 miles vs 2000.

      Apart from both of them floating (hehe) there’s really no comparison.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      American ships have to be able to extend their coverage across some big areas, which requires bigger boats and all the manpower and resources that takes. Russia only worries about Russia.