• RoadRunner451@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    this is not a purely theoretical question. in practice, autonomous vehicles face exactly this dilemma. or rather the manufacturers of the vehicles who have to set the specifications

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I forget where it was from but years ago I found an online survey on autonomous cars and their decision making from a university. It was all about deciding to swerve or not in a collision. All kinds of difficult encounters like do you hit the barrier and kill the passenger or swerve and kill the old lady? Do you hit thin person or serve and hit the heavier person?

      I’ve never seen a survey drill down into biases quite so deeply.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did this as a part of our ethics discussion.

        My eventual answer was you always kill the non-driver as no one would ever buy a car that will kill them over someone else.

      • Larvitar@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        From what I’ve seen of real world examples, not “what if the car had 5 cats in it and the person on the crosswalk had a stroller full of 6 cat, swerve into a barricade?”, telsa cars just release control of the autonomous controls to the person behind the wheel a few seconds before impact so the driver is fully liable.