Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 months agofixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square806fedilinkarrow-up1864arrow-down1134
arrow-up1730arrow-down1imagefixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubVuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square806fedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·10 months agoWhat makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others?
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoThat it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·10 months agoIs benefiting others morally justifiable?
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·10 months agoWhat is the moral justification for your answer?
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 months agoIt’s actually axiomatic. I can’t really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·10 months agoThis is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 months agoLook up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·10 months agoWhy do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?
What makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others?
That it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent.
Is benefiting others morally justifiable?
Yes
What is the moral justification for your answer?
It’s actually axiomatic. I can’t really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy.
This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
Look up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
Why do you get to define axioms to exclude my definition?