Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It would require that a significant portion of the population admit their parents mutilated them as infants.

    For some reason, they refuse to admit they were mutilated without their consent.

    Some of them have subsequently mutilated their own sons, and admitting that was mutilation is beyond their capacity.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I was circumcised, I don’t have a problem with that fact. I understand why people do have a problem with circumcision and I don’t have an issue with it being banned.

      Don’t try to induce mental trauma in me for my past that I’m not bothered by.

      • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good for you not being bothered by it. But I think it’s rather easy to imagine that it can be a traumatizing experience and lead to psychological or physiological injuries. So it’s a medical procedure that should only be prescribed by doctors or if you are an adult.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I have been physically punished when I did something bad as a kid. I’m not traumatized by that either but I still think it’s good that it’s illegal nowdays.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I agree. And if people went around claiming you must be traumatized over it and lying to yourself you’d say they’re full of shit. If someone was trying to convince you to be traumatized about it you’d tell them to fuck off.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I don’t think they’re saying people are traumatized. That word has a meaning. They’re saying people have issue reconciling the fact that their parents would do something like that to them and also that their parents are generally good people. Many people would rather not even consider that it wasn’t the right call, because it makes it easier to hold those two beliefs at the same time. However, people make mistakes. Those aren’t contradictory ideas if you can understand that people can be mislead.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you a persons who is refusing to admit.

        Thanks for demonstrating my point so effectively.

        • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          What? They’re not bothered by it how the fuck is that refusing to admit anything? Does that mean if two people get jumped scared in a dark room and one for the rest of their life needs a light on in their room and the other doesn’t that they are secretly traumatized? No it doesn’t.

          Also circumcision happens at birth most of the time so many people (myself included) don’t remember it. It should absolutely be illegal but as the other person said don’t tell someone what traumas they faced and how they should be effected.

          You’re a clown

          • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            so many people (myself included) don’t remember it.

            "She doesn’t remember being raped, so it’s ok’.

    • Briguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have a neutral stance on circumcision. Do what you please. I just wish people like you could try to prove a point without using “mutilation” over and over to make it sound worse than it actually is. It puts an agenda on your point and biases it. There’s nothing mutilated about it. It’s just altered.

      If you consider this to be mutilation then that would also mean you think any gender affirming surgery is also mutilation. And one could much easier argue that converting a penis to a vagina is far more mutilating than just removing some extra skin from a penis.

      So if you’re trying to convince people to stop circumcision, stop using overly dramatic words and just explain why it’s not necessary. Otherwise I’ll just roll my eyes at people like you.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If you consider this to be mutilation then that would also mean you think any gender affirming surgery is also mutilation.

        No one gets gender reassignment surgery until they can concentyi it as an adult.

        False equivalence.