• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        They shouldn’t need to. They should never have included a known toxic material in a drink container

        • idiomaddict@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          We include toxic materials in all sorts of things that we regularly consume, this is one of the least dangerous ways to do it. I get being against all of it, but I’d start with trying to remove the lead paint in Baltimore, which affects thousands of children a year.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Lead paint has been illegal for decades. Why are you whatabout-ing this with things done in the past? It’s a lot easier to simply avoid doing a new bad thing than it is to go undo a million instances of bad things done long ago.

            • idiomaddict@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The lead paint is still there and landlords are still profiting off of buildings covered in it without sufficient penalties to stop.

              I just don’t think it’s nearly as big a problem as it sounds like it is- I’m not saying people should go out and buy one, but it’s almost certainly not going to harm you, so you don’t need to throw one out if you already have it*

              Edit: maybe do throw it out because of the nickel

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah that’s just a separate issue. Obviously it should be addressed it’s just not relevant. We can care about multiple things.

                • idiomaddict@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Of course we can, and again, I’m not trying to get people to buy them. I just don’t think the lead’s really something people need to worry about. Hell, it sounds like the nickel would actually be the big problem with these cups.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Well that’s when you’re supposed to get rid of the cup because… Well… It’s fucking broken!

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        From what I understand, it can easily be thought of as some exterior part that’s not important. A visual piece. It would still hold water fine.

        I’d be amazed if you’ve never used something that has some small plastic piece break but it still functions fine.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        So as long as people throw away something that still seems useful, they won’t get lead poisoning. What a great way to view the world. You should run the FDA!