“There’s no way to get there without a breakthrough,” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.

  • andrai@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    1 GW of solar is much cheaper than 1 GW of nuclear. Solar is both cheaper to build and cheaper to run. It’s the most efficient energy source e currently have.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Plus it doesn’t have the con of meltdown and nuclear fallout. Safer nuclear power is still potentially fucking dangerous for life for 20000 years. Nuclear fission energy is the height of human hubris.

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nuclear produces that 1 GW 24/7 and all year though. My solar panels vastly overproduce on most summer days and are worthless at nights and from fall to spring.

      • kalleboo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        If we’re still talking about AI, you can ramp up the AI training and batch workloads when the sun is shining and stop them overnight. It’s one of those things like aluminum smelters where you can adjust the load

      • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        They stop reactors all the time. It’ll probably be cheaper to get a massive battery pack+solar