Stamets@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 7 months agoClear differencestartrek.websiteimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1326arrow-down13
arrow-up1323arrow-down1imageClear differencestartrek.websiteStamets@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareZectivi@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·7 months agoI never knew there was a difference. Is it just the nacelle placement and the little “hump” just aft of the saucer?
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·7 months agoDocking bay also sticks out more in the back in the Nemesis version
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 months agoNemesis Enterprise got booty.
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up11·7 months agoI like big docks and I cannot lie
minus-squareBonehead@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoThat’s only because the nacelle pylons moved forward a little and got wider.
minus-squareJohnhones@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·7 months agoIt’s a fin on the top, for aerodynamics
minus-squareHeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 months agoAlso those racing stripes make it look real sharp
minus-squareZectivi@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoI may not be a smart person, but aerodynamics… in space?
minus-squareUmmdustry@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 months agoform drag is proportional to: The denisty of the medium. The velocity of the moving body (squared). Interstellar space might be very undense, peaking at about 10^-15 kg/m^3… However the enterprise E is very fast, with warp 9.9 being approx 20,000 c or 6 * 10^13 m/s, and that matters twice as much This puts the overall cosmodymanic forces at Cd * 3.6 * 10^12 N/m^2 or approximately the same as experienced by a Sandworm going mach 30. So sure why not, Einstein and Newton are dead so can’t complain, and I’m pretty sure I could beat up Bill Nye.
minus-squareZectivi@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 months agoI have no grounds to question anything that you said, but all I can imagine is this image.
minus-squarei_love_FFT@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoMoving mass towards the center to reduce rotational inertia and increase manoeuvrability! Little changes can bring great improvements in space battles.
I never knew there was a difference. Is it just the nacelle placement and the little “hump” just aft of the saucer?
Docking bay also sticks out more in the back in the Nemesis version
Nemesis Enterprise got booty.
I like big docks and I cannot lie
That’s only because the nacelle pylons moved forward a little and got wider.
It’s a fin on the top, for aerodynamics
Also those racing stripes make it look real sharp
I may not be a smart person, but aerodynamics… in space?
form drag is proportional to:
Interstellar space might be very undense, peaking at about 10^-15 kg/m^3…
However the enterprise E is very fast, with warp 9.9 being approx 20,000 c or 6 * 10^13 m/s, and that matters twice as much
This puts the overall cosmodymanic forces at Cd * 3.6 * 10^12 N/m^2 or approximately the same as experienced by a Sandworm going mach 30.
So sure why not, Einstein and Newton are dead so can’t complain, and I’m pretty sure I could beat up Bill Nye.
I have no grounds to question anything that you said, but all I can imagine is this image.
Moving mass towards the center to reduce rotational inertia and increase manoeuvrability! Little changes can bring great improvements in space battles.