King@r.nf to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 个月前Turmoil at OpenAI shows we must address whether AI developers can regulate themselvestheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down113
arrow-up1130arrow-down1external-linkTurmoil at OpenAI shows we must address whether AI developers can regulate themselvestheconversation.comKing@r.nf to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 个月前message-square20fedilink
minus-squareubermeisters@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up62·9 个月前Nobody can regulate themselves. There. I made a whole lot of things easier.
minus-squareCharlesMangione@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·9 个月前An artificial intelligence designed to the task could, but
minus-squarehersh@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·9 个月前But then it will follow hallucinated regulations.
minus-squaregedaliyah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·9 个月前My conspiracy theory is that AI is already running OpenAI, which explains all the weird erratic decisions
minus-squarepdxfed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 个月前What do you mean we weren’t trained on boardroom shadow takeovers by 49% non-voting members scenarios?
Nobody can regulate themselves. There. I made a whole lot of things easier.
An artificial intelligence designed to the task could, but
But then it will follow hallucinated regulations.
My conspiracy theory is that AI is already running OpenAI, which explains all the weird erratic decisions
What do you mean we weren’t trained on boardroom shadow takeovers by 49% non-voting members scenarios?
deleted by creator