Chloyster [she/her]@beehaw.orgM to Gaming@beehaw.org · 7 months agoTake-Two Interactive sued over use of virtual currencywww.gamesindustry.bizexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down10
arrow-up143arrow-down1external-linkTake-Two Interactive sued over use of virtual currencywww.gamesindustry.bizChloyster [she/her]@beehaw.orgM to Gaming@beehaw.org · 7 months agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareconciselyverbose@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoPay to win is literally the only part any human being with a shred of intelligence could in any way find objectionable. You’re literally paying to advance in a specific game. That’s the transaction. It is not possible to believe it could possible apply to anything else.
minus-squareampersandrew@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7·7 months agoAccording to the article, that’s not what they find objectionable.
minus-squareconciselyverbose@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoWhich is why their lawyer should be disbarred for wasting the court’s time. There is no possible argument that’s either legally or morally justified in any context that the purchase should transfer.
Pay to win is literally the only part any human being with a shred of intelligence could in any way find objectionable.
You’re literally paying to advance in a specific game. That’s the transaction. It is not possible to believe it could possible apply to anything else.
According to the article, that’s not what they find objectionable.
Which is why their lawyer should be disbarred for wasting the court’s time.
There is no possible argument that’s either legally or morally justified in any context that the purchase should transfer.
Okay, cool.