Lately I’ve heard people attacking the veracity of the fairy tale book with statements like “Jesus wasn’t real” or it was a psy op operation by the Romans that got out of control. And I hate talking about reddit but it’s basically the atheism mods policy over there that Jesus wasn’t real.

I usually rely on the Wikipedia as my litmus test through life, which shouldn’t work in theory but is great in practice:

Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

Virtually all scholars agree that a Jewish man called Jesus of Nazareth did exist in Palestine in the 1st century CE. The contrary perspective, that Jesus was mythical, is regarded as a fringe theory.

Edit: My suggestion to any who would like to see my opinion changed (see above quote) is to get on the Wikipedia and work towards changing the page. My upvote goes to Flying Squid for reminding us “does not matter at all because that’s not who Christians worship”

Edit 2: practicality changed to practice

  • constantokra@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know nearly enough to judge whether carrier is rigorous or reliable, but having read a couple of his books, it made enough sense for me to basically dismiss the question of whether or not anything about Jesus was based on a real guy. I’ve not seen proof that he was, though I recognize that given the languages and historical contexts involved, the field isn’t one that lends itself to armchair speculation.

    Something I can say is that most of the scholars are religious, and most of the ones who aren’t still were raised religious. It’s obvious that there are a lot of preconceptions being thrown around, and a lot of overtly religious people muddying the waters.