Buy better bread!

Lemmy is incapable of dealing with abstract thoughts, your comment made sense to me

Went from a fair question to assumptions and bad vibes. Classic ml JAQ

Also consider that if it’s all you ever knew, you might just be trying to make the most of it, without defending the practice.

Sex feels great to me, I wish I was uncut, and I would never circumcise my son if I had one.

Wuuuuuuuuuuuuut

It’s a distinctly not normal hobby, and sometimes a sexual fetish. That’s ok.

Abnormal is not lesser.

To play along: this is what a red flag law is for, in theory.

Stuff is happening, the guns should be removed until stuff isn’t happening

Because never listen to a cop, that advice sure as shit isn’t helping now that the DA has come knocking

And then someone makes a meta post like this, restarting the cycle

I think this is just familiarity. I never have issues with indentation, but when refactoring js I’m always like hey who’s fucking brace is this

Those are the charges yes, but how is this any different than what all sorts of corporations do

When you discuss the topic of regulation you have to address availability. Ignoring the difference in availability during your discussion highlights lack of attention for the challenge.

Calling all rifles automatic assault weapons is like saying you flew Denver to Newark on the space shuttle. It simply doesn’t make sense, and devalues the important points

Absolutely untrue.

The point, is that the most common device to do this with is ubiquitous and easy to access.

Properly defining it, and clarifying what is being used is important to coherently discussing the issue.

I clarified the relevance. The point is the weapons that are being used to do these things are common, and basic. They aren’t special weapons of war, which are more regulated, more rare.

You just missed the critical thinking.

Ar 15s are common. Fully automatic assault rifles are far less so.

Not being pedantic to kneecap you but the language matters. An AR 15 is not fully automatic

I’m not saying this to minimize what happened, or the danger of an ar15, but to clarify that fully automatic weapons are much more rare, and much more dangerous.

The contention is that a 14 yo is not a capable owner of a gun. They’re a child. The parent owns everything they have, in actuality. Both their possessions and their responsibilities/consequences.

It doesn’t matter who did or didn’t lock it, it’s the parents lack of a lock, parent’s lack of supervision, Parents gun, parent’s everything

Lol people don’t know how to build a personality that isn’t built out of stuff.

They’ve moved on to posting 3rd party critiques that only seem to target dems.

Well, random dude wishing you well. I hope you find a way to a path that is more acceptable to you, soon.