• hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Just wait until some lemming explains why this is bad for unions and Biden is the devil in Big Oil pockets because he refused to have the whole economy hostage for a conflict. When he still negotiated after the fact and the workers got what they wanted.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just there to get a click and maybe a couple ads in. Surprisingly standard now when looking for news.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Holy fuck, stop repeating this bullshit people. The IBEW voted for the original contract with 1 sick day. They’re a small part of the railworkers and weren’t one that wanted to strike in the first place. And they absolutely did not get everything they wanted. They wanted 15 days! Congress tried to give them 7! Biden got them 4. Nevermind the non-sick day asks.

          Unions deserve the right to accept or reject their own contracts, not wait for a third party to decide what’s reasonable.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          You think 4 sick days a year is “everything they asked for”? Really?

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s most of what they asked for, actually, which is a sad indictment of the initial state of affairs

            They wanted 7.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          After delegitimizing strikes (in the US) universally, Biden got them 4 days (instead of 15) and failed to address any other grievances of the workers. I wouldn’t say that equation balances out, exactly.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m saving this link. Cause the few times I’ve mentioned it I’ve been crucified for being a “librul” by supposed communists. Like he isn’t my favorite, but credit is due here. He avoided the shutdown, and then got them what they wanted. He did it that way to avoid a shutdown. I don’t see the negative here.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          He avoided the shutdown

          I’m not a communist, but that’s carefully worded bullshit for “broke a strike”. Credit is absolutely due for his walking with the UAW now, but the only credit due for the railworkers is bad credit. He didn’t get them what they wanted, he got them some of what he wanted, and worker power isn’t about other people getting you things, it’s about being able to demand them for yourself.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I mean hes center-right. He wasn’t really worried about the workers he was worried about Christmas shopping. I believe workers shouldn’t be limited to the amount of times they can somehow not catch microscopic diseases. Idk if anybody is able to give the workers what they want. I think the politicians are too afraid countries will flee over seas or quit operations if it isnt profitable.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            the only credit due for the railworkers is bad credit.

            Leftists: did you get us everything we want, immediately and without reservation?

            Liberals: no but I got a lot and I’m working towards–

            Leftists: FUCK YOU GO DIE IN A FIRE I’M VOTING FOR LITERAL FASCISM NOW

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Sure man. I’m not a leftist and I’m a reliable (albeit meaningless) vote for Biden, but keep telling yourself that being strongly pro-labor means people are voting for Republicans. Pretending bad things are good doesn’t actually work. Biden was bad in the rail strike and he’s better now. Hopefully going forward his (and others’) support for labor will be unwavering.

              • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I hate how nuance goes out the window in these discussions sometimes. I’d rate Biden’s actions on the rail strike as “lukewarm”. Think about it from a moderate perspective. It makes sense to avoid a rail shutdown, because that would cause a lot of harm to a lot of people, working class and otherwise. Biden wants to make sure the economy keeps moving so people can keep making money. This is his best shot at “harm reduction”, and he did more than was expected of him. That’s the point. I can’t imagine having to be in that position to try and make these decisions to make everyone happy. And, for what it’s worth, 4-7 paid sick days (dependent on the employer) is pretty standard for most jobs in the US. I’d say that while this was pretty lukewarm, it’s still overall a good thing and could lay the rails so to speak for future improvements as well.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Think about it from a moderate perspective.

                  Why? “You can’t force people to work” isn’t a position to compromise on. He didn’t have to please everyone, he only had to stick up for the inherent rights of workers. I don’t have any right to tell you to work, even if you not working would harm me. It’s not a position you need to compromise with me on. It’s entirely right and good for at least one party to unequivocally side with labor.

                  And if a strike is just unacceptable, force the labor-friendly contract and then nationalize the railroads. People act like it was the workers against the economy when the whole issue came about because a private for-profit entity wasn’t willing to give them sick days. There were two parties that could have been made to sacrifice for the greater good, but for some reason people think the only option was screwing the workers.

                  And, for what it’s worth, 4-7 paid sick days (dependent on the employer) is pretty standard for most jobs in the US.

                  “Well X job also gets 4” is irrelevant. Some jobs are less safety critical so an employee working sick won’t endanger others and other jobs should be striking for more. It’s to the workers themselves to decide what a reasonable contract is.

                  …it’s still overall a good thing and could lay the rails so to speak for future improvements as well.

                  Except breaking a strike means the employers don’t need to fear one as much in future negotiations. The likelihood of Congressional intervention was reportedly a factor in their willingness to take a demand of 15 days and counter with 1. Next time around they’ll be even more confident that they don’t need to listen to worker demands. Establishing a “too big to strike” norm means their unions are kind of just for show, because work stoppages are the primary tool unions have to negotiate.

            • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              No no no no… you can say that about legislation. You cannot say it about forcing them to end a strike then getting them crumbs as a consolation.

              They weren’t asking the government to ‘get’ them anything. They were striking and demanding it themselves. The only fucking response from liberals in that case SHOULD have been to stay the fuck out of it so the workers can get things on their terms.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Semantics. The point is that “good” isn’t good enough for leftists, and anything that isn’t good enough is Bad

                • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Online communists frequently let perfect be the enemy of the good. Many of the people yelling at you online (not all!) have never participated in any form of boots-on-the-ground activism, never done mutual aid, never attended a protest. Given that a solid majority of these people who get very loud online are slacktivists, I wouldn’t worry too much about what people say online. Go out there, do real praxis, and advocate for what’s right.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              He did not, they wanted 15 days, he got them 4. Congressional Democrats tried to get them 7. Don’t make provably false assertions. The UAW stuff is great, but blowing smoke up people’s asses about how the rail strike breaking was actually no big deal is much worse than just acknowledging it and saying Biden is doing better now.

        • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          The negative is that the union wasn’t allowed to show its power, and actually had its power reduced by this. They shouldn’t need a savior to come in and do it for them, they should be able to advocate for themselves and get it done themselves, showing the working class our power.

          That said, this is a good compromise which works better for more people, in this case.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I do wish they didn’t need a savior. Shit we need a Laborers party here more than ever. What would be required to truly bend these companies, though? They are so massive, and the government appears to be on their side more often than not. We would almost need a general strike to get everything we wanted. Which 17 fucken sick days ain’t shit. Some peopoe wipe that out just with the changing of the seasons and its not fair. You don’t control when you are sick.

                • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The only way we’re going to change it is with unions. I work in tech. There are no unions in tech. It just simply does not happen much. I tried to unionize my workplace and was met with such severe apathy I only got 8 out of 50 people on board.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        That pressure, plus the IBEW’s ongoing efforts, is paying off at last. The IBEW and BNSF Railway reached an agreement April 20 to grant members four short-notice, paid sick days, with the ability to also convert up to three personal days to sick days. The union reached similar understandings with CSX and Union Pacific on March 22, and with Norfolk Southern on March 10. Unused sick time at the end of a year can be paid out or rolled into a worker’s 401(k) retirement account.

        Wow he got them 4 whole sick days!

        They were demanding 15 days.

        Fuck anti-union Biden.

        • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Are you sure about that? I’m pretty sure they were specifically demanding 4 sick days. You should provide a source for your claim.

            • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Thank you! That is indeed shitty. I’d say it’s a bit short of an L though, and I hope Biden’s recent actions show that he’s being more serious about workers’ rights. His NLRB has been doing a lot lately.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      From what other people have posted when I asked about this in the past, it appears that it was a short-term stop, and they actually continued to negotiate and got results at a later time.

    • hypelightfly@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yes, but you’ll get defenders who believed the asshole union rep that was against the strike in the first place saying he came through.

      He didn’t. They didn’t get what they wanted, they got terms that had already been rejected by the majority and many of them still don’t have sick days despite the misleading headlines saying otherwise.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        K well dudes posted a link with evidenxe of them getting the sick days. Since I’ve been yanked back and forth so hard on this. Can you post where you found that this isn’t what they wanted and the administration did leave them to the corps? Genuinely want to know the truth.