• SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    “I don’t like drama” is always said by people who cause drama. This drama stirring meme is 100% expected from someone who would write that title

    • SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ehh, who cares? It’s just more political nonsense anyways, and the less I see of that shit the better.

  • lichtmetzger@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    On feddit.de, lemmy.world is only temporarily defederated because of CSAM until a patch is merged into Lemmy that prevents images from being downloaded to your own instance.

    So I’ll just be patient and wait. It’s understandable the admins don’t want to get problems with law enforcement.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Makes quite a bit of sense

      Depending on jurisdiction it can be pretty hairy if your instance downloads it

      IANAL but I’m pretty sure that in the US you have a “duty to report” and you can have legal protections if you end up getting it and then reporting it

      But IANAL so I’d recommend looking into it with an actual lawyer if you run a website that hosts content

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Won’t that lead to some horrible hug-of-death type scenarios if a post from a small instance gets popular on a huge one?

      • CoderKat@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, but arguably it was never very scalable for federated software to store large media. It gets utterly massive quick. Third party image/video hosts that specialize in hosting those things can do a better job. And honestly, that’s the kinda data that is just better suited for centralization. Many people can afford to spin up a server that mostly just stores text and deals with basic interactions. Large images or streaming video gets expensive fast, especially if the site were to ever get even remotely close to reddit levels.

        • cadekat@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you’re only responsible for caching for your own users, you don’t unduly burden smaller instances.

        • 30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          How would one realize CSAM protection? You’d need actual ML to check for it, and I do not think there are trained models available. And now find someone that wants to train such a model, somehow. Also, running an ML model would be quite expensive in energy and hardware.

          • NightAuthor@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            There are models for detecting adult material, idk how well they’d work on CSAM though. Additionally, there exists a hash identification system for known images, idk if it’s available to the public, but I know apple has it.

            Idk, but we gotta figure out something

      • kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Maybe a system where the files federate after 3 upvotes from outside the original instance?

        • parlaptie@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’d still be exploitable. You could just run 3 of your own instances. Coming up with a system to stop malicious users that can’t be gamed would be tricky.

    • OnU@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Feddit is defed from so many instances it’s actually not usable for me.

  • monad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    It would be less of a problem if we as users on an instance could block entire instances, effectively defederating it just for our user. Then those running instances could defederate only in severe cases.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Blocking an instance on a user by user basis has a key drawback in the sense of those instances you block can still influence the posts and comments via up and down votes

      Defederating basically means that those instances no longer have any influence on the community you’re a part of

      Basically think of it this way, say you’re on a queer friendly instance that is still federated with a right wing instance. That right wing instance can manipulate the posts of the queer friendly instance by up voting queerphobic content and down voting queer positive content. And you block the instance as a user those votes still federated over so you’ll see queer positive content getting down voted to oblivion.

    • MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I can’t wait for Lemmy to catch up with Mastodon in this regard. Between this and not being able to easily migrate your account to a new instance, it doesn’t feel like Lemmy users have as much of the freedom that the fediverse can provide.

    • yimby@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Connect is a great android app where you can block instances. Though I agree this should be a site wide feature.

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even on public instances, I don’t understand why people think defederating hurts the fediverse. Just join a different instance, how hard can it be?

    I’m on 3 different instances right now

    • balderdash@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Social media needs to be as easy as possible if you’re going to reach the masses. Most people do not give a shit enough to create 3 accounts; they’ll just leave.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s just fine with me. Quality > quantity

        Some of the best forums I use have just a handful of active users

        • CoderKat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          But quantity and quality are linked. If only, say, 0.1% of people will post high quality content, that means you need to attract a thousand people to get a high quality poster. You can’t just put up a sign that says “high quality posters only”. Plenty of quality posters also want an audience, so they’ll go where the people are and leave if that audience isn’t there.

          • balderdash@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            This. I love reddit r/askhistorians and r/askphilosophy. But the vast fkn majority of people are not qualified to answer historical or philosophical questions. In these cases you need a lot of people on the site.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ok, and I’ll go where I like the most people I like ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

            I left reddit for many reasons. I don’t want most of those people here.

            So, to be blunt, I don’t care

            • Bongles@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              So circling back then, if the high quality posters leave here, sure you’ll leave with them and you’ll be fine, but it still hurts the fediverse if they leave.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do we have a way to combine feeds yet? I don’t know of one. So it’s kinda annoying to jump from account to account to make sure your seeing everything.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m not sure there is. Personally, I wish there were a way for an individual to block entire instances since I’m a terminally online individual with 3 accounts who sorts by all -> new for content :P

        I get what you’re saying, and hopefully it’s a feature that gets added. I’m sure eventually it will, or maybe someone will make an app or an add-on

    • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I would say that a big part of the issue is the difficulty in transferring one’s account. Ignoring the fact that one simply can’t transfer their posts, trying to manually copy all previously subscribed communities to a new account is a rather tedious task. I am aware that there exists scripts that can automate that process, but I don’t think that it’s fair to expect that the userbase should run 3rd party scripts. Until account transfer is properly implemented, defederation will continue to be a major issue.

      • ZiemekZ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The migration must be perfect, which means posts, comments and up/downvotes from the source instance must appear as if they’ve always been on the target instance.

    • Doug [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t get it either. Defederation is a tool just like banning or spam prevention. If it’s unused it’s pointless to have.

      But you don’t ban everyone for a single offense just like to don’t defederate lightly. If you do then people will move elsewhere and the problem resolves itself

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I just use one, but AFAICT they don’t defederate, they haven’t even defederated anyone on their mastodon instance and that’s had a lot longer to have all manner of inter-instance bullshit develop.

    • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Too many people never used forums and think every site needs to talk to every site.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Fair, but a lot of new users might also get discouraged if the first thing they see is content from exploding-heads or hexbear, and the instances that strive to be safe, inclusive spaces and thus do a significant amount of defederating are usually quite forthright about this when you sign up. For example, I knew just what to expect when I joined beehaw.

        The instance I’m posting from now tries to keep things inclusive more via moderation vs. defederation. There are pros and cons to each approach. I can see both perspective.

        I just don’t think either approach harms the fediverse. I think that’s a bit melodramatic.

        • Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Funny enough, Hexbear actually defederated from my main instance first, due to it not being inclusive enough for their standards. My own experiences with Hexbear as an autistic enby are that Hexbear is actually the most inclusive Lemmy instance out there, by no small margin. The issue with Hexbear is that its users like to “punch up” at non-leftists, pointing out how people propagate or benefit from exploitative systems, and justify these systems to themselves.

          Being “dunked on” may annoy and wound the pride of non-leftists, but this is also very much not the same as the actually evil Nazi shit posted to EH, which “punches down”. I have for many years understood the difference between being annoyed and having my pride wounded for having a bad opinion, and being actively terrorized and marginalized for being a member of a marginalized group. The world would be better off if more people understood that difference.

    • Baku@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Some vile individuals started spamming a community on lemmy.world with some awful content, so some instances defederated with them temporarily as images are decentralised and currently hosted on any instance that has people who saw it as well as on the original instance it was posted to. That’d my understanding, anyway

  • Nothing@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ein föderiertes Netzwerk, das seinen größten Vorteil aufgrund unterschiedlicher Meinungen selbst deföderiert.

    #FindedenFehler